Home Forum
Welcome, Guest
Username Password: Remember me

Long traditional forms versus new short forms
(1 viewing) (1) Guest
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Long traditional forms versus new short forms

Long traditional forms versus new short forms 1 year, 3 months ago #28

  • Toupaipai
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 15
  • Karma: 0
I was wordering what is the best way to learn taichi movements and techniques: through traditional long forms (108 yang, Chen's Lao jia, 108 Chang Sang Feng ...) or newer and shorter forms (24 yang, 18 chen, 36 Wudang...).

On one hand, I like to learn from a traditional long form, because they collect most of the techniques and principles of their style, and also I like the taste of practicing a traditional form!

On the other hand, learning a shorter form is easier, and allows people to learn a complete form sooner, what motivates the practicer.

And you people, what do you prefer?
Last Edit: 1 year, 3 months ago by Toupaipai.

Re: Long traditional forms versus new short forms 1 year, 2 months ago #32

  • shen
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 0
With no doubt I prefer traditional forms...If old masters made these long forms, it should be for some reason, don't you think?

Re: Long traditional forms versus new short forms 1 year ago #37

  • Crilin
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: 0
For me the evolution of the styles has not to be a bad thing. Shorter forms were developed to improve the way to learn martial techniques, and they condensate the essence of a style.
Observing several long forms you can see that they contain a lot of repeated movements. That is avoided by new shorter forms.
With no doubt, new short forms are better!
  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.90 seconds